PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVSU vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVSU vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF (AVSU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVSU achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.82% return.


AVSU

1D
-1.53%
1M
1.56%
YTD
14.14%
6M
13.08%
1Y
31.63%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
10Y*

USFR

1D
0.04%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVSU vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AVSU
Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF
14.14%16.69%19.16%24.50%-10.86%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.82%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AVSU and USFR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

-0.03

The correlation between AVSU and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVSU vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVSU
AVSU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AVSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSU Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSU Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVSU vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF (AVSU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVSUUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-46.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

13.31

-11.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

201.33

-198.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

779.76

-765.60

AVSU vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVSU Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVSU and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVSU vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVSU drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSU and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVSUUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.67%

-1.36%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-0.02%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-0.06%

-20.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

0.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-0.15%

-5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.01%

+2.23%

Volatility

AVSU vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF (AVSU) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that AVSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVSUUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

0.09%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

0.19%

+11.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

0.27%

+13.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.92%

0.40%

+17.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.92%

0.78%

+17.14%

AVSU vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AVSU and USFR have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVSU vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

AVSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than USFR's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVSU
Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF
1.13%1.03%1.22%1.22%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.90%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVSU and USFR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVSU has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVSU dropped -21.67% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 3-year performance, AVSU leads with 21.35% vs 4.74% for USFR. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVSU has performed better with a 21.35% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVSU and USFR have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.13% for AVSU.

AVSU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. AVSU tracks Russell 3000 Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and WisdomTree.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.67 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVSU and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer