AVSG.L vs. SILG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AVSG.L (Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - AVSG.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. AVSG.L is actively managed, while SILG.L is passively managed. Over the past year, AVSG.L returned 38.58% vs 96.79% for SILG.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVSG.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SILG.L.

Performance

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVSG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AVSG.L is traded in USD, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVSG.L achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly higher than SILG.L's 5.36% return.

AVSG.L

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 17.60%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 38.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILG.L

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: 17.53%
• 1Y: 96.79%
• 3Y*: 49.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AVSG.L Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc	17.60%	12.18%	-4.47%
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	5.36%	173.15%	-17.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AVSG.L and SILG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	0.26

Return for Risk

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVSG.L

AVSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
AVSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AVSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AVSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AVSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
AVSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SILG.L

SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVSG.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVSG.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	1.88	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	2.35	+1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.29	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.57	2.99	+2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.27	7.22	+14.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVSG.L and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVSG.L	SILG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	1.88	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.69	+0.37

Drawdowns

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVSG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.38%, smaller than the maximum SILG.L drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSG.L and SILG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVSG.L	SILG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.38%	-31.97%	+10.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.90%	-31.97%	+25.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-25.27%	+24.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-13.21%	+9.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	13.30%	-11.49%

Volatility

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVSG.L) is 3.39%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 19.16%. This indicates that AVSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVSG.L	SILG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	19.16%	-15.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.04%	41.44%	-32.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.87%	51.03%	-38.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	42.60%	-26.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.87%	42.60%	-26.73%

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVSG.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVSG.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVSG.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVSG.L and SILG.L in my portfolio?

AVSG.L and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVSG.L or SILG.L?

On fees, AVSG.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVSG.L or SILG.L?

AVSG.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

What is the main difference between AVSG.L and SILG.L?

AVSG.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SILG.L is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for AVSG.L and 0.65% for SILG.L.