AVSF vs. DDV
AVSF (Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVSF is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Avantis, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVSF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
AVSF vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVSF achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.23% return.
AVSF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVSF vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVSF Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | 0.43% | 0.85% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.23% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVSF and DDV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVSF vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
AVSF
DDV
AVSF vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVSF | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.15 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.28 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVSF | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 2.06 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
AVSF vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVSF drawdown since its inception was -8.85%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSF and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVSF | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -1.92% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.12% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -0.35% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
AVSF vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVSF | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88% | 2.68% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 2.68% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.52% | 2.68% | -0.16% |
AVSF vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVSF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVSF vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
AVSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSF Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF | 4.02% | 4.31% | 4.34% | 3.93% | 1.78% | 0.48% | 0.10% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVSF and DDV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVSF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVSF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
AVSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
AVSF is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVSF and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for AVSF and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer