PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVR vs. ABOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVR vs. ABOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anteris Technologies Global Corp (AVR) and Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVR achieves a 57.11% return, which is significantly higher than ABOS's 1.90% return.


AVR

1D
-4.85%
1M
-23.44%
6M
31.32%
YTD
57.11%
1Y
155.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.84%

ABOS

1D
-0.92%
1M
-21.53%
6M
-17.31%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
59.26%
3Y*
-33.34%
5Y*
-32.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-38.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$726.33K$876.46K$1.09M
$7.66M$9.78M$11.23M

AVR vs. ABOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVR
Anteris Technologies Global Corp
57.11%-10.57%-7.00%
ABOS
Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.90%22.67%-16.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AVR and ABOS is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVR:

$288.42M

ABOS:

$155.29M

EPS

AVR:

-$5.99

ABOS:

-$1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVR:

$1.85M

ABOS:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVR:

$1.38M

ABOS:

-$45.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

AVR:

-$69.11M

ABOS:

-$111.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Anteris Technologies Global Corp

Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Return for Risk

AVR vs. ABOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVR
AVR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ABOS
ABOS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ABOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ABOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVR vs. ABOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anteris Technologies Global Corp (AVR) and Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVRABOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.44

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

2.70

+5.28

AVR vs. ABOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the ABOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVR and ABOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVR vs. ABOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVR drawdown since its inception was -71.46%, smaller than the maximum ABOS drawdown of -96.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVR and ABOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVRABOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.46%

-96.41%

+24.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.77%

-37.39%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.83%

-91.42%

+65.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-81.83%

+47.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.16%

19.90%

-1.74%

Volatility

AVR vs. ABOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anteris Technologies Global Corp (AVR) is 14.33%, while Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS) has a volatility of 20.29%. This indicates that AVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVRABOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.33%

20.29%

-5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.46%

51.02%

-9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.80%

86.16%

-10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.18%

96.91%

-6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.18%

97.00%

-6.82%

Dividends

AVR vs. ABOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVR nor ABOS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AVR vs. ABOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anteris Technologies Global Corp and Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AVR and ABOS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABOS has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to AVR (14.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVR dropped -71.46% vs ABOS's -96.41%.

AVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVR and ABOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer