PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMV vs. CVAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVMV vs. CVAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) and Cultivar ETF (CVAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVMV vs. CVAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
4.47%10.46%18.43%15.56%
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
-0.40%14.95%3.12%14.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMV achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than CVAR's -0.40% return.


AVMV

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
4.47%
6M
8.50%
1Y
21.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVAR

1D
1.10%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
1.93%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AVMV vs. CVAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CVAR's 0.87% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AVMV vs. CVAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMV
AVMV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AVMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CVAR
CVAR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CVAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CVAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMV vs. CVAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) and Cultivar ETF (CVAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVMVCVARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

0.71

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.10

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.14

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.01

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.62

3.64

+2.98

AVMV vs. CVAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the CVAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMV and CVAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVMVCVARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.71

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.36

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between AVMV and CVAR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AVMV vs. CVAR - Dividend Comparison

AVMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than CVAR's 1.53% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
1.09%1.20%1.30%0.25%0.00%
CVAR
Cultivar ETF
1.53%1.53%3.57%1.41%5.52%

Drawdowns

AVMV vs. CVAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMV drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, which is greater than CVAR's maximum drawdown of -19.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMV and CVAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMVCVARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-19.39%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-10.62%

-3.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-7.18%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-5.49%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

2.97%

+0.38%

Volatility

AVMV vs. CVAR - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Cultivar ETF (CVAR) at 3.76%. This indicates that AVMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVMVCVARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

3.76%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.76%

8.81%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.67%

14.80%

+5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

15.70%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

15.70%

+2.67%