AVIG vs. BSCQ
AVIG (Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. AVIG is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVIG returned 0.13%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for BSCQ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVIG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
AVIG vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVIG achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.
AVIG
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
AVIG vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVIG Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF | 0.08% | 7.98% | 1.55% | 6.41% | -13.94% | -2.15% | 0.96% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVIG and BSCQ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AVIG and BSCQ has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVIG vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
AVIG
BSCQ
AVIG vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 3.45 | -2.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 43.24 | -41.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 179.65 | -173.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 7.06 | -5.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.45 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.60 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
AVIG vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVIG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVIG and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.64% | -16.50% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -0.10% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.03% | -1.13% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.47% | -13.02% | -6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | 0.00% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -2.85% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.02% | +0.90% |
Volatility
AVIG vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF (AVIG) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that AVIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVIG | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 0.17% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 0.43% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 0.63% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 3.30% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 4.77% | +1.24% |
AVIG vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVIG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVIG vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
AVIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVIG Avantis Core Fixed Income ETF | 4.04% | 4.36% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 2.53% | 1.12% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVIG and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVIG has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVIG dropped -19.64% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 5-year performance, BSCQ leads with 1.47% vs 0.13% for AVIG. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 1.47% return vs 0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVIG.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 4.04% for AVIG.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVIG and 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVIG and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer