AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO
AVGY.TO (Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. AVGY.TO is actively managed, while EACC.NEO is passively managed. Over the past year, AVGY.TO returned 107.90% vs 19.76% for EACC.NEO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVGY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EACC.NEO.
Performance
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGY.TO achieves a 42.92% return, which is significantly higher than EACC.NEO's 7.82% return.
AVGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 42.92%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EACC.NEO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 19.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 42.92% | 83.42% |
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 7.82% | 9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGY.TO and EACC.NEO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
AVGY.TO
EACC.NEO
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) and Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGY.TO | EACC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 1.76 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 6.04 | +2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGY.TO | EACC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.33 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.30 | 0.89 | +1.40 |
Drawdowns
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, which is greater than EACC.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGY.TO and EACC.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGY.TO | EACC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -13.35% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.50% | -11.30% | -17.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.48% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -2.09% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 3.28% | +9.01% |
Volatility
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.20% compared to Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) at 4.43%. This indicates that AVGY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EACC.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGY.TO | EACC.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.20% | 4.43% | +8.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.23% | 12.76% | +20.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.46% | 14.96% | +30.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 15.05% | +36.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 15.05% | +36.08% |
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EACC.NEO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGY.TO vs. EACC.NEO - Dividend Comparison
AVGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.08%, more than EACC.NEO's 7.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AVGY.TO Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 19.08% | 14.82% | 0.00% |
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 7.46% | 7.55% | 5.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGY.TO and EACC.NEO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EACC.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AVGY.TO and 0.49% for EACC.NEO.
Find the right allocation for AVGY.TO and EACC.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer