AVGW vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. AVGW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

AVGW vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGW achieves a 22.93% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.13% return.

AVGW

• 1D: -14.53%
• 1M: -2.93%
• YTD: 22.93%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGW vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	22.93%	20.91%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.13%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGW and OMAH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	-0.02

AVGW vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVGW	OMAH
Technology	33.2%	13.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	16.2%
Energy	-	10.5%
Financial Services	-	38.9%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AVGW vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGW vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVGW	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.74	+0.31

Drawdowns

AVGW vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGW	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.65%	-11.83%	-22.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.71%	-2.12%	-13.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.21%	-1.26%	-10.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVGW	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.87%	8.06%	+47.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.87%	13.20%	+42.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.87%	13.20%	+42.67%

AVGW vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGW vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.01%, more than OMAH's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	52.01%	31.15%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.36%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGW and OMAH in my portfolio?

AVGW and OMAH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVGW or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGW or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGW or OMAH?

AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 52.01%, compared with 15.36% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between AVGW and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AVGW and 0.95% for OMAH.