AVGW vs. LLII

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) and LLII (REX LLY Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

AVGW vs. LLII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGW achieves a 43.84% return, which is significantly higher than LLII's -4.28% return.

AVGW

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 17.30%
• YTD: 43.84%
• 6M: 27.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LLII

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 9.79%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGW vs. LLII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	43.84%	-3.27%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	-4.28%	19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGW and LLII is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

AVGW vs. LLII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and REX LLY Growth & Income ETF (LLII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVGW	LLII	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	0.71	+0.99

Drawdowns

AVGW vs. LLII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than LLII's maximum drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and LLII.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGW	LLII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.65%	-23.96%	-10.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-6.88%	+5.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.19%	-9.28%	-2.91%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVGW	LLII	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.65%	36.42%	+17.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.65%	36.42%	+17.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.65%	36.42%	+17.23%

AVGW vs. LLII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AVGW and LLII have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

AVGW vs. LLII - Dividend Comparison

AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.45%, more than LLII's 25.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	44.45%	31.15%
LLII REX LLY Growth & Income ETF	25.95%	5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGW and LLII in my portfolio?

AVGW and LLII have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVGW or LLII?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGW or LLII?

AVGW and LLII have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGW or LLII?

AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 44.45%, compared with 25.95% for LLII.

What is the main difference between AVGW and LLII?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX.