AVGW vs. HBTA
AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) and HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HBTA.
Performance
AVGW vs. HBTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGW achieves a 43.84% return, which is significantly higher than HBTA's 14.07% return.
AVGW
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 17.30%
- YTD
- 43.84%
- 6M
- 27.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTA
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGW vs. HBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 43.84% | 20.91% |
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | 14.07% | 11.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGW and HBTA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGW vs. HBTA — Risk / Return Rank
AVGW
HBTA
AVGW vs. HBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGW | HBTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 0.91 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
AVGW vs. HBTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than HBTA's maximum drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and HBTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGW | HBTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -26.73% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.68% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -4.22% | -7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.80% | — |
Volatility
AVGW vs. HBTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGW | HBTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.65% | 17.18% | +36.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.65% | 24.85% | +28.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.65% | 24.85% | +28.80% |
AVGW vs. HBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HBTA's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGW vs. HBTA - Dividend Comparison
AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.45%, more than HBTA's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 44.45% | 31.15% |
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGW and HBTA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.
AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 44.45%, compared with 0.56% for HBTA.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AVGW and 0.85% for HBTA.
Find the right allocation for AVGW and HBTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer