PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGW vs. HBTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGW vs. HBTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGW achieves a 43.84% return, which is significantly higher than HBTA's 14.07% return.


AVGW

1D
-1.38%
1M
17.30%
YTD
43.84%
6M
27.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBTA

1D
-0.68%
1M
7.20%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.43%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGW vs. HBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AVGW
Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF
43.84%20.91%
HBTA
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
14.07%11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGW and HBTA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGW vs. HBTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGW

HBTA
HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGW vs. HBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AVGW vs. HBTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGWHBTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

0.91

+0.78

Drawdowns

AVGW vs. HBTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than HBTA's maximum drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and HBTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGWHBTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-26.73%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.68%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-4.22%

-7.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

Volatility

AVGW vs. HBTA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGWHBTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.65%

17.18%

+36.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.65%

24.85%

+28.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.65%

24.85%

+28.80%

AVGW vs. HBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HBTA's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGW vs. HBTA - Dividend Comparison

AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.45%, more than HBTA's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AVGW
Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF
44.45%31.15%
HBTA
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
0.56%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGW and HBTA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.

AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 44.45%, compared with 0.56% for HBTA.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AVGW and 0.85% for HBTA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGW and HBTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer