AVGW vs. HBTA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) and HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HBTA.

Performance

AVGW vs. HBTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVGW having a 9.31% return and HBTA slightly lower at 9.30%.

AVGW

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -10.16%
• YTD: 9.31%
• 6M: 7.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBTA

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 7.78%
• 1Y: 28.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGW vs. HBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	9.31%	20.48%
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	9.30%	11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGW and HBTA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.63

Return for Risk

AVGW vs. HBTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBTA

HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 54
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGW vs. HBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVGW	HBTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.86	—

Drawdowns

AVGW vs. HBTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than HBTA's maximum drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and HBTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGW	HBTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.65%	-26.73%	-7.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.05%	-4.82%	-20.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.78%	-4.17%	-8.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVGW	HBTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.18%	18.27%	+38.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.18%	25.01%	+32.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.18%	25.01%	+32.17%

AVGW vs. HBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HBTA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGW vs. HBTA - Dividend Comparison

AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 63.17%, more than HBTA's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF	63.17%	31.15%
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	0.58%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGW and HBTA in my portfolio?

AVGW and HBTA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVGW or HBTA?

On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGW or HBTA?

HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGW or HBTA?

AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 63.17%, compared with 0.58% for HBTA.

What is the main difference between AVGW and HBTA?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AVGW and 0.85% for HBTA.