PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGV vs. ITDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGV vs. ITDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGV achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than ITDB's 5.87% return.


AVGV

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
17.14%
6M
15.89%
1Y
35.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITDB

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
5.87%
6M
5.36%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGV vs. ITDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
17.14%22.57%11.26%12.17%
ITDB
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF
5.87%14.58%9.65%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGV and ITDB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.84

The correlation between AVGV and ITDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGV vs. ITDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ITDB
ITDB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGV vs. ITDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGVITDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

2.55

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

11.00

+5.96

AVGV vs. ITDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the ITDB Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGV and ITDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGV vs. ITDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGV drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, which is greater than ITDB's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGV and ITDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGVITDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.03%

-8.41%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-5.66%

-2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-0.90%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-0.94%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.31%

+0.78%

Volatility

AVGV vs. ITDB - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) at 2.83%. This indicates that AVGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGVITDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

2.83%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

6.39%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

7.57%

+5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

8.66%

+6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

8.66%

+6.35%

AVGV vs. ITDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than ITDB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVGV vs. ITDB - Dividend Comparison

AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than ITDB's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
2.47%1.98%2.32%1.14%
ITDB
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF
1.94%2.05%1.96%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGV and ITDB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGV has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to ITDB (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGV dropped -17.03% vs ITDB's -8.41%.

On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 35.38% vs 14.40% for ITDB. On fees, ITDB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ITDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 35.38% return vs 14.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITDB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.94% for ITDB.

AVGV is categorized as Global Equities, while ITDB is Target Retirement Date. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for AVGV and 0.09% for ITDB.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGV and ITDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer