PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGO vs. RYTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVGO vs. RYTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RYTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than RYTM's -4.62% return.


AVGO

1D
-2.69%
1M
-0.04%
6M
19.77%
YTD
10.76%
1Y
33.25%
3Y*
62.78%
5Y*
54.08%
10Y*
40.54%
ALL TIME*
40.63%

RYTM

1D
-0.55%
1M
-5.07%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-4.62%
1Y
16.99%
3Y*
79.24%
5Y*
38.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.07B$8.48B$10.45B
$56.40M$83.39M$77.65M

AVGO vs. RYTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
10.76%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%6.86%
RYTM
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-4.62%91.21%21.78%57.86%191.78%-66.43%29.49%-14.58%-7.50%25.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGO and RYTM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017

0.23

The correlation between AVGO and RYTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVGO:

$1.82T

RYTM:

$7.00B

EPS

AVGO:

$6.01

RYTM:

-$3.07

PS Ratio

AVGO:

24.69

RYTM:

31.22

PB Ratio

AVGO:

21.24

RYTM:

846.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVGO:

$75.47B

RYTM:

$217.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVGO:

$50.53B

RYTM:

$194.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

AVGO:

$42.03B

RYTM:

-$182.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGO vs. RYTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RYTM
RYTM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RYTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGO vs. RYTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RYTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGORYTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.10

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

0.48

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

1.08

+1.29

AVGO vs. RYTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the RYTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGO and RYTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGO vs. RYTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum RYTM drawdown of -92.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and RYTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGORYTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.30%

-92.10%

+43.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.67%

-35.54%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.15%

-35.54%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-84.18%

+43.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.57%

-13.20%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-31.87%

+23.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.05%

15.72%

-1.67%

Volatility

AVGO vs. RYTM - Volatility Comparison

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RYTM) at 10.14%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGORYTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.54%

10.14%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.10%

33.95%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.24%

45.24%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.88%

76.35%

-32.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.69%

71.27%

-31.58%

Dividends

AVGO vs. RYTM - Dividend Comparison

AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while RYTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.67%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
RYTM
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AVGO vs. RYTM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadcom Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.19B
60.11M
(AVGO) Total Revenue
(RYTM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVGO vs. RYTM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadcom Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
67.2%
88.1%
Portfolio components
AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

RYTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 52.96M and revenue of 60.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

RYTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of -52.36M and revenue of 60.11M, resulting in an operating margin of -87.1%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.

RYTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of -56.74M and revenue of 60.11M, resulting in a net margin of -94.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGO and RYTM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to RYTM (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs RYTM's -92.10%.

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGO and RYTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer