PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGO vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGO vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 8.05% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 41.61%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.64% annualized return.


AVGO

1D
3.11%
1M
-7.35%
YTD
14.06%
6M
16.39%
1Y
59.68%
3Y*
67.77%
5Y*
56.37%
10Y*
41.61%

FCNTX

1D
1.31%
1M
1.79%
YTD
8.05%
6M
9.44%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
26.44%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
17.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGO vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
14.06%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.05%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGO and FCNTX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009

0.63

The correlation between AVGO and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGO vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGO vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGOFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.97

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

8.27

-3.42

AVGO vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGO and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGO vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGOFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.30%

-49.19%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.67%

-11.30%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.15%

-19.75%

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-32.59%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.30%

-32.59%

-15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-1.13%

-17.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-8.15%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.35%

2.69%

+9.66%

Volatility

AVGO vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 19.97% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 5.14%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGOFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.97%

5.14%

+14.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.15%

11.22%

+23.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.64%

14.58%

+31.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.42%

19.23%

+24.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.54%

19.71%

+19.83%

Dividends

AVGO vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.63%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.32%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGO and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (19.97%) compared to FCNTX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGO and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer