AVGG vs. TSMG
AVGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVGG returned 161.88% vs 297.71% for TSMG. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGG charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
AVGG vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGG achieves a 71.17% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 86.06% return.
AVGG
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 29.67%
- YTD
- 71.17%
- 6M
- 37.06%
- 1Y
- 161.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- -4.26%
- 1M
- 15.77%
- YTD
- 86.06%
- 6M
- 95.35%
- 1Y
- 297.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGG vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGG Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF | 71.17% | 91.29% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 86.06% | 119.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGG and TSMG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between AVGG and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGG vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
AVGG
TSMG
AVGG vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 8.50 | -5.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | 27.74 | -20.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 4.18 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.52 | 1.69 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
AVGG vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGG drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGG and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.77% | -63.67% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.77% | -35.29% | -18.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -4.26% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -16.98% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.09% | 10.79% | +13.30% |
Volatility
AVGG vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) have volatilities of 23.84% and 23.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGG | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.84% | 23.14% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.82% | 55.07% | +6.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.10% | 71.74% | +14.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.79% | 81.06% | +3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.79% | 81.06% | +3.73% |
AVGG vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGG vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
AVGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than TSMG's 6.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVGG Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF | 1.32% | 2.26% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 6.17% | 11.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGG and TSMG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGG has higher volatility (23.84%) compared to TSMG (23.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGG dropped -53.77% vs TSMG's -63.67%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 297.71% vs 161.88% for AVGG. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSMG has been the lower-risk option at 23.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 297.71% return vs 161.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for AVGG.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 1.32% for AVGG.
Their fees differ too: 0.76% for AVGG and 0.75% for TSMG.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGG and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer