AVGB vs. PBOG
AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis, while PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. AVGB is actively managed, while PBOG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. AVGB charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
AVGB vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 31.74% return.
AVGB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 29.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGB vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 0.84% | 0.19% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 31.74% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGB and PBOG is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | -0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGB vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
AVGB
PBOG
AVGB vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGB | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGB | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.06 | 3.24 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
AVGB vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGB drawdown since its inception was -2.12%, smaller than the maximum PBOG drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGB and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGB | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -11.45% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -7.15% | +6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -3.13% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility
AVGB vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGB | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48% | 23.59% | -21.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 23.59% | -21.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 23.59% | -21.11% |
AVGB vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVGB vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
AVGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 3.46% | 3.49% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGB and PBOG have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for AVGB.
AVGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
AVGB is categorized as Global Bonds, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for AVGB and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for AVGB and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer