AVGB vs. IXC
AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. AVGB is actively managed, while IXC is passively managed. Over the past year, AVGB returned 4.50% vs 47.24% for IXC. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. AVGB charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXC.
Performance
AVGB vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 29.38% return.
AVGB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 29.38%
- 6M
- 28.04%
- 1Y
- 47.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
AVGB vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 0.84% | 4.89% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.38% | 16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGB and IXC is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGB vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
AVGB
IXC
AVGB vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGB | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 4.91 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 14.62 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGB | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.53 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.06 | 0.32 | +1.75 |
Drawdowns
AVGB vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGB drawdown since its inception was -2.12%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGB and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGB | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -67.88% | +65.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | -9.66% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -6.88% | +6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -17.48% | +17.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 3.24% | -2.67% |
Volatility
AVGB vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) is 0.84%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that AVGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGB | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 6.83% | -5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 15.49% | -13.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48% | 18.79% | -16.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 23.51% | -21.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 26.85% | -24.37% |
AVGB vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGB vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
AVGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than IXC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 3.46% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGB and IXC have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to AVGB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGB dropped -2.12% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 1-year performance, IXC leads with 47.24% vs 4.50% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IXC has performed better with a 47.24% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.
AVGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.85% for IXC.
AVGB is categorized as Global Bonds, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for AVGB and 0.46% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGB and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer