AVGB vs. AVGV
AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) and AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis, while AVGV is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVGB returned 4.50% vs 37.49% for AVGV. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVGB charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.
Performance
AVGB vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 17.52% return.
AVGB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGV
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.05%
- 1Y
- 37.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGB vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 0.84% | 4.89% |
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 17.52% | 29.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGB and AVGV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGB vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank
AVGB
AVGV
AVGB vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) and Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGB | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.52 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 4.64 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 18.19 | -10.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGB | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.91 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.06 | 1.47 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
AVGB vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGB drawdown since its inception was -2.12%, smaller than the maximum AVGV drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGB and AVGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGB | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -17.03% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | -8.12% | +6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.02% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -2.29% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 2.07% | -1.50% |
Volatility
AVGB vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) is 0.84%, while Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that AVGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGB | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 3.44% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.91% | 9.87% | -7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48% | 12.93% | -10.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 14.97% | -12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 14.97% | -12.49% |
AVGB vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVGB vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison
AVGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than AVGV's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF | 3.46% | 3.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 1.88% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGB and AVGV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGV has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to AVGB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGB dropped -2.12% vs AVGV's -17.03%.
On 1-year performance, AVGV leads with 37.49% vs 4.50% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.
AVGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 1.88% for AVGV.
AVGB is categorized as Global Bonds, while AVGV is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for AVGB and 0.26% for AVGV.
AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGB and AVGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer