AVEE vs. XCNY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

AVEE (Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF) and XCNY (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. AVEE is actively managed, while XCNY is passively managed. Over the past year, AVEE returned 19.42% vs 30.73% for XCNY. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVEE charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XCNY.

Performance

AVEE vs. XCNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVEE achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than XCNY's 14.37% return.

AVEE

• 1D: -4.75%
• 1M: -6.57%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 9.74%
• 1Y: 19.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XCNY

• 1D: -4.45%
• 1M: -3.03%
• YTD: 14.37%
• 6M: 17.01%
• 1Y: 30.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVEE vs. XCNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AVEE Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF	9.07%	19.80%	-1.37%
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	14.37%	20.42%	-3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AVEE and XCNY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.82

The correlation between AVEE and XCNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVEE vs. XCNY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVEE	XCNY
Technology	22.5%	36.1%
Industrials	18.2%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	5.6%
Basic Materials	9.5%	8.7%
Financial Services	9.3%	21.7%
Healthcare	6.9%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	3.6%
Real Estate	4.2%	2.3%
Utilities	2.9%	3.3%
Communication Services	2.8%	3.5%
Energy	2.2%	4.9%

Return for Risk

AVEE vs. XCNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVEE

AVEE Risk / Return Rank: 34
AVEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AVEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AVEE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AVEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AVEE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

XCNY

XCNY Risk / Return Rank: 57
XCNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XCNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XCNY Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XCNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XCNY Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVEE vs. XCNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVEE	XCNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.79	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.47	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.60	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.82	9.94	-4.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVEE vs. XCNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the XCNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVEE and XCNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVEE	XCNY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	1.79	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.99	-0.07

Drawdowns

AVEE vs. XCNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVEE drawdown since its inception was -20.21%, roughly equal to the maximum XCNY drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEE and XCNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVEE	XCNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.21%	-19.70%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.65%	-11.86%	+1.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.62%	-5.49%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.68%	-4.14%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	3.10%	+0.24%

Volatility

AVEE vs. XCNY - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) have volatilities of 7.88% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVEE	XCNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	7.62%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	15.21%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.41%	17.22%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.87%	18.04%	-1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.87%	18.04%	-1.17%

AVEE vs. XCNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVEE has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XCNY's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVEE vs. XCNY - Dividend Comparison

AVEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than XCNY's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AVEE Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF	2.12%	2.25%	3.26%	0.39%
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	2.35%	2.68%	1.07%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVEE and XCNY in my portfolio?

AVEE and XCNY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVEE or XCNY?

AVEE has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to XCNY (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEE dropped -20.21% vs XCNY's -19.70%.

Which ETF is better, AVEE or XCNY?

On 1-year performance, XCNY leads with 30.73% vs 19.42% for AVEE. On fees, XCNY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XCNY has been the lower-risk option at 7.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVEE or XCNY?

Over the 1-year period, XCNY has performed better with a 30.73% return vs 19.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVEE or XCNY?

XCNY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for AVEE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVEE or XCNY?

XCNY has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 2.12% for AVEE.

What is the main difference between AVEE and XCNY?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for AVEE and 0.15% for XCNY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.