PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDV vs. ISCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDV vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than ISCF's 7.28% return.


AVDV

1D
-0.73%
1M
3.98%
YTD
16.04%
6M
19.54%
1Y
44.23%
3Y*
28.01%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*

ISCF

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.65%
YTD
7.28%
6M
10.16%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDV vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.04%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.28%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%13.31%7.65%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDV and ISCF is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.94

The correlation between AVDV and ISCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVDV vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVDV
ISCF

Basic Materials

22.5%
11.2%

Industrials

21.3%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
12.4%

Financial Services

13.7%
12.3%

Energy

10.8%
4.8%

Technology

6.4%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.1%

Healthcare

2.1%
5.4%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.8%

Utilities

1.7%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
8.8%

Basic Materials

AVDV
22.5%
ISCF
11.2%

Industrials

AVDV
21.3%
ISCF
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AVDV
14.4%
ISCF
12.4%

Financial Services

AVDV
13.7%
ISCF
12.3%

Energy

AVDV
10.8%
ISCF
4.8%

Technology

AVDV
6.4%
ISCF
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

AVDV
3.4%
ISCF
4.1%

Healthcare

AVDV
2.1%
ISCF
5.4%

Communication Services

AVDV
2.0%
ISCF
3.8%

Utilities

AVDV
1.7%
ISCF
3.6%

Real Estate

AVDV
1.1%
ISCF
8.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDV vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDV vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVDVISCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.28

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.94

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

7.28

+6.39

AVDV vs. ISCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the ISCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDV and ISCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVDVISCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.54

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.44

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.49

+0.31

Drawdowns

AVDV vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, which is greater than ISCF's maximum drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and ISCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDVISCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.01%

-40.79%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-11.34%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-13.85%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-30.70%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-2.64%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-8.14%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.02%

+0.22%

Volatility

AVDV vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison

Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) at 4.33%. This indicates that AVDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDVISCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

4.33%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

11.86%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

14.39%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

16.66%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

17.44%

+2.29%

AVDV vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCF's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDV vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison

AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than ISCF's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.74%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.50%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AVDV and ISCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVDV has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to ISCF (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs ISCF's -40.79%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 7.26% for ISCF. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.74% for AVDV.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 0.40% for ISCF.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDV and ISCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer