AUTO.L vs. S
AUTO.L (Auto Trader Group plc) and S (SentinelOne, Inc.) are both stocks. AUTO.L operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while S operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, AUTO.L returned -7.78%/yr vs 6.25%/yr for S. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AUTO.L vs. S - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AUTO.L is traded in GBp, while S is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the S values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUTO.L achieves a -21.11% return, which is significantly lower than S's 10.65% return.
AUTO.L
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -21.11%
- 6M
- -23.96%
- 1Y
- -41.38%
- 3Y*
- -7.78%
- 5Y*
- -2.43%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
S
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- -3.27%
- 1Y
- -7.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUTO.L vs. S - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTO.L Auto Trader Group plc | -21.11% | -25.07% | 11.27% | 41.99% | -29.20% | 17.76% |
S SentinelOne, Inc. | 10.65% | -37.25% | -17.68% | 78.67% | -67.67% | 21.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUTO.L and S is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
AUTO.L:
£3.90B
S:
$5.57B
AUTO.L:
£0.67
S:
-$0.95
AUTO.L:
3.23
S:
5.26
AUTO.L:
9.58
S:
3.87
AUTO.L:
£1.23B
S:
$1.05B
AUTO.L:
£924.60M
S:
$776.52M
AUTO.L:
£807.60M
S:
-$279.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUTO.L vs. S — Risk / Return Rank
AUTO.L
S
AUTO.L vs. S - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Auto Trader Group plc (AUTO.L) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUTO.L | S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.01 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.18 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | -0.35 | -1.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUTO.L | S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.58 | -0.15 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.27 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
AUTO.L vs. S - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUTO.L drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, smaller than the maximum S drawdown of -84.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUTO.L and S.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUTO.L | S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -84.41% | +32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.20% | -39.55% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.25% | -62.85% | +10.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.63% | -78.35% | +29.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -64.90% | +53.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.57% | 20.47% | +7.10% |
Volatility
AUTO.L vs. S - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Auto Trader Group plc (AUTO.L) is 13.79%, while SentinelOne, Inc. (S) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that AUTO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUTO.L | S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.79% | 17.31% | -3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 38.29% | -15.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.08% | 47.11% | -21.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 62.78% | -36.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 62.78% | -34.53% |
Dividends
AUTO.L vs. S - Dividend Comparison
AUTO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while S has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTO.L Auto Trader Group plc | 2.37% | 1.81% | 1.21% | 1.16% | 2.11% | 0.68% | 0.40% | 1.13% | 1.30% | 1.47% | 0.37% |
S SentinelOne, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AUTO.L vs. S - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Auto Trader Group plc and SentinelOne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AUTO.L vs. S - Profitability Comparison
AUTO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Auto Trader Group plc reported a gross profit of 233.00M and revenue of 306.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.0%.
S - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SentinelOne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 198.69M and revenue of 276.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.8%.
AUTO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Auto Trader Group plc reported an operating income of 190.60M and revenue of 306.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.2%.
S - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SentinelOne, Inc. reported an operating income of -79.72M and revenue of 276.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -28.8%.
AUTO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Auto Trader Group plc reported a net income of 143.00M and revenue of 306.60M, resulting in a net margin of 46.6%.
S - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SentinelOne, Inc. reported a net income of -76.16M and revenue of 276.66M, resulting in a net margin of -27.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AUTO.L and S have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AUTO.L and S
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer