PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUGU vs. AUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUGU vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGU achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than AUGT's 6.25% return.


AUGU

1D
-0.65%
1M
4.64%
YTD
8.60%
6M
8.31%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUGT

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.19%
YTD
6.25%
6M
6.91%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGU vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AUGU and AUGT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024

0.96

The correlation between AUGU and AUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUGU vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGU
AUGU Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AUGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGU Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

AUGT
AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGU vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUGUAUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.52

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

3.60

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

18.69

-5.41

AUGU vs. AUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the AUGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGU and AUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUGUAUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.58

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.56

-0.19

Drawdowns

AUGU vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGU drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum AUGT drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGU and AUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUGUAUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-13.12%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-5.36%

-1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.09%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-1.22%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.03%

+0.60%

Volatility

AUGU vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) at 0.73%. This indicates that AUGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUGUAUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

0.73%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

5.50%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.36%

7.50%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

10.19%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.06%

10.19%

+0.87%

AUGU vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AUGU and AUGT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

AUGU vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUGU nor AUGT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AUGU and AUGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AUGU has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to AUGT (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGU dropped -12.17% vs AUGT's -13.12%.

On 1-year performance, AUGU leads with 21.60% vs 19.22% for AUGT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, AUGT has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AUGU has performed better with a 21.60% return vs 19.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUGU and AUGT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

AUGU and AUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUGU and AUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer