AUGT vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. AUGT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.

Performance

AUGT vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AUGT

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: 19.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGT vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF	5.33%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

AUGT vs. JULQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AUGT	JULQ
Technology	36.2%	31.7%
Financial Services	11.9%	14.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.4%
Healthcare	8.4%	10.9%
Industrials	8.1%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.2%
Energy	3.5%	3.2%
Utilities	2.3%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

AUGT vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGT

AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 83
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGT vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUGT	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.88	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUGT	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.56	—	—

Drawdowns

AUGT vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGT drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGT and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGT	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	0.00%	-13.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	0.00%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AUGT	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.48%	0.00%	+7.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.18%	0.00%	+10.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.18%	0.00%	+10.18%

AUGT vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUGT vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUGT nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AUGT or JULQ?

On fees, AUGT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUGT or JULQ?

AUGT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUGT or JULQ?

AUGT and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AUGT and JULQ?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for AUGT and 0.79% for JULQ.