AUGT vs. FLAO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) and FLAO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUGT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while FLAO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AUGT returned 16.74% vs 3.33% for FLAO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

AUGT vs. FLAO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGT achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than FLAO's -0.89% return.

AUGT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 16.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLAO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: -0.89%
• 6M: -1.33%
• 1Y: 3.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGT vs. FLAO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF	5.86%	14.64%	11.14%
FLAO AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF	-0.89%	3.38%	9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGT and FLAO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.93

The correlation between AUGT and FLAO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AUGT vs. FLAO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGT

AUGT Risk / Return Rank: 82
AUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
AUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FLAO

FLAO Risk / Return Rank: 17
FLAO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FLAO Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FLAO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FLAO Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FLAO Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGT vs. FLAO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUGT	FLAO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	0.59	+1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	0.82	+2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.14	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	0.44	+2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.21	1.78	+14.43

AUGT vs. FLAO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the FLAO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGT and FLAO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUGT vs. FLAO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGT drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, which is greater than FLAO's maximum drawdown of -10.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGT and FLAO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGT	FLAO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	-10.12%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.36%	-7.60%	+2.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-2.10%	+1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-1.91%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	1.88%	-0.84%

Volatility

AUGT vs. FLAO - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF (FLAO) at 0.68%. This indicates that AUGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUGT	FLAO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	0.68%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.58%	5.07%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.35%	5.67%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.12%	7.41%	+2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.12%	7.41%	+2.71%

AUGT vs. FLAO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AUGT and FLAO have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

AUGT vs. FLAO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUGT nor FLAO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUGT and FLAO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AUGT and FLAO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AUGT or FLAO?

AUGT has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to FLAO (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGT dropped -13.12% vs FLAO's -10.12%.

Which ETF is better, AUGT or FLAO?

On 1-year performance, AUGT leads with 16.74% vs 3.33% for FLAO. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, FLAO has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUGT or FLAO?

Over the 1-year period, AUGT has performed better with a 16.74% return vs 3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUGT or FLAO?

AUGT and FLAO have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUGT or FLAO?

AUGT and FLAO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AUGT and FLAO?

AUGT is categorized as Options Trading, while FLAO is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.