ATS vs. AG
ATS (ATS Corporation) and AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) are both stocks. ATS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while AG operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, ATS returned 13.52%/yr vs 5.48%/yr for AG. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATS vs. AG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATS achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than AG's 18.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ATS has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 13.52%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.48% annualized return.
ATS
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- -10.15%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- -2.99%
- 3Y*
- -13.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
AG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 6M
- 26.15%
- 1Y
- 181.03%
- 3Y*
- 49.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
ATS vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATS ATS Corporation | 4.76% | -9.65% | -29.23% | 39.27% | -22.16% | 128.07% | 5.58% | 55.37% | -10.46% | 27.39% |
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 18.81% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATS and AG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ATS and AG shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ATS:
$0.97
AG:
$0.60
ATS:
29.67
AG:
33.16
ATS:
1.62
AG:
0.59
ATS:
0.71
AG:
6.54
ATS:
$2.97B
AG:
$1.49B
ATS:
$850.80M
AG:
$646.49M
ATS:
$357.63M
AG:
$824.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATS vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank
ATS
AG
ATS vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATS Corporation (ATS) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATS | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | 2.49 | -2.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.18 | 2.82 | -2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 4.24 | -4.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 9.46 | -9.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATS | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 2.49 | -2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.04 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.09 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.05 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
ATS vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATS drawdown since its inception was -56.76%, smaller than the maximum AG drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATS and AG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATS | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.76% | -90.20% | +33.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | -42.92% | +17.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.76% | -42.92% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.76% | -76.89% | +20.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.76% | -80.82% | +24.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.80% | -38.18% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.90% | -59.21% | +39.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.78% | 19.23% | -6.45% |
Volatility
ATS vs. AG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ATS Corporation (ATS) is 19.42%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 22.62%. This indicates that ATS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATS | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.42% | 22.62% | -3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.82% | 56.05% | -23.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.56% | 73.23% | -32.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.36% | 61.33% | -20.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 61.84% | -23.20% |
Dividends
ATS vs. AG - Dividend Comparison
ATS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.18% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% |
ATS ATS Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ATS vs. AG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ATS Corporation and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATS vs. AG - Profitability Comparison
ATS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corporation reported a gross profit of 188.27M and revenue of 747.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.
AG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 259.78M and revenue of 470.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
ATS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corporation reported an operating income of 23.21M and revenue of 747.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
AG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 232.71M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.
ATS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corporation reported a net income of -16.11M and revenue of 747.10M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
AG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 126.32M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATS and AG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (22.62%) compared to ATS (19.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATS dropped -56.76% vs AG's -90.20%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATS and AG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer