ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO
ATS.TO (ATS Corp) and GRT-UN.TO (Granite Real Estate Investment Trust) are both stocks. ATS.TO operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while GRT-UN.TO operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, ATS.TO returned 14.11%/yr vs 14.34%/yr for GRT-UN.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATS.TO achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than GRT-UN.TO's 18.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ATS.TO having a 14.11% annualized return and GRT-UN.TO not far ahead at 14.34%.
ATS.TO
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -15.90%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- -3.89%
- 3Y*
- -13.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
GRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 18.76%
- 6M
- 28.20%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.34%
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATS.TO ATS Corp | 3.83% | -13.75% | -23.24% | 35.69% | -16.22% | 124.79% | 4.29% | 48.92% | -7.46% | 24.20% |
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 18.76% | 22.79% | -4.30% | 15.18% | -31.89% | 40.45% | 23.02% | 29.65% | 14.45% | 16.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATS.TO and GRT-UN.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2003 | 0.16 |
The correlation between ATS.TO and GRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ATS.TO:
CA$0.97
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$6.39
ATS.TO:
40.36
GRT-UN.TO:
14.95
ATS.TO:
1.01
GRT-UN.TO:
0.92
ATS.TO:
0.97
GRT-UN.TO:
9.25
ATS.TO:
CA$2.97B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$629.87M
ATS.TO:
CA$850.98M
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$517.51M
ATS.TO:
CA$363.61M
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$513.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATS.TO
GRT-UN.TO
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATS Corp (ATS.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATS.TO | GRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.39 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 3.41 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 10.95 | -11.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATS.TO | GRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 2.29 | -2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.37 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.64 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.37 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATS.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.49%, which is greater than GRT-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -87.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATS.TO and GRT-UN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATS.TO | GRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.49% | -87.70% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.98% | -12.91% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.09% | -27.99% | -25.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.09% | -37.82% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.09% | -44.89% | -8.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.81% | -0.95% | -37.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.58% | -16.30% | -41.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.51% | 4.01% | +7.50% |
Volatility
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
ATS Corp (ATS.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.58% compared to Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) at 5.91%. This indicates that ATS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATS.TO | GRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.58% | 5.91% | +12.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.22% | 14.77% | +17.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.63% | 19.28% | +20.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.80% | 21.88% | +15.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 22.43% | +12.58% |
Dividends
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATS.TO ATS Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.64% | 4.17% | 4.74% | 4.21% | 4.49% | 3.03% | 3.75% | 4.25% | 5.69% | 5.63% | 5.77% | 6.44% |
Financials
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ATS Corp and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
ATS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corp reported a gross profit of 188.27M and revenue of 747.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.
ATS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corp reported an operating income of 25.70M and revenue of 747.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.
ATS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corp reported a net income of -16.11M and revenue of 747.10M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATS.TO and GRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATS.TO and GRT-UN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer