ATR.L vs. SCVAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ATR.L (Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc) is a stock, while SCVAX (Allspring Small Company Value Fund) is Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 10 years, ATR.L returned 15.59%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for SCVAX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATR.L vs. SCVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc (ATR.L) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ATR.L is traded in GBp, while SCVAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCVAX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATR.L achieves a 30.32% return, which is significantly higher than SCVAX's 16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ATR.L has outperformed SCVAX with an annualized return of 15.59%, while SCVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.62% annualized return.

ATR.L

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 14.93%
• YTD: 30.32%
• 6M: 31.26%
• 1Y: 57.62%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 15.59%

SCVAX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 14.84%
• 1Y: 26.91%
• 3Y*: 11.05%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATR.L vs. SCVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATR.L Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc	30.32%	19.35%	12.63%	10.29%	-17.46%	4.94%	35.64%	13.08%	-7.28%	43.92%
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund	16.34%	-5.50%	10.11%	9.43%	-1.69%	38.10%	-1.00%	17.55%	-9.09%	1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ATR.L and SCVAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007	0.20

Return for Risk

ATR.L vs. SCVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATR.L

ATR.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
ATR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ATR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ATR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ATR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ATR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SCVAX

SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 45
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATR.L vs. SCVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc (ATR.L) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATR.L	SCVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.78	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	2.53	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.32	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	3.76	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.12	13.21	+1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATR.L vs. SCVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the SCVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATR.L and SCVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATR.L	SCVAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.78	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.37	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.47	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.36	+0.07

Drawdowns

ATR.L vs. SCVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATR.L drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than SCVAX's maximum drawdown of -56.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATR.L and SCVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATR.L	SCVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.72%	-56.37%	-14.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.63%	-7.70%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-28.57%	+9.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.93%	-28.57%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.92%	-41.44%	+5.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.92%	-1.05%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.27%	-10.14%	-8.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	2.19%	+1.61%

Volatility

ATR.L vs. SCVAX - Volatility Comparison

Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc (ATR.L) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) at 3.87%. This indicates that ATR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATR.L	SCVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.17%	3.87%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.49%	11.06%	+6.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.14%	16.33%	+3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.28%	19.67%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	22.86%	-1.83%

Dividends

ATR.L vs. SCVAX - Dividend Comparison

ATR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCVAX's 5.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATR.L Schroders Investment Trusts - Schroder Asian Total Return Investment Company plc	1.61%	2.05%	2.38%	2.50%	2.08%	1.40%	1.33%	1.68%	1.45%	1.24%	1.49%	1.71%
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund	5.06%	5.88%	8.23%	0.77%	4.33%	6.02%	0.39%	0.48%	0.71%	0.30%	0.04%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATR.L and SCVAX in my portfolio?

ATR.L and SCVAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.