ATOIX vs. DMNBX
ATOIX (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund) and DMNBX (DFA MN Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ATOIX returned 2.39%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for DMNBX. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ATOIX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DMNBX.
Performance
ATOIX vs. DMNBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATOIX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than DMNBX's 0.96% return.
ATOIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.89%
DMNBX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 1.68%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ATOIX vs. DMNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 1.46% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 3.27% | 0.87% | -0.04% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 1.54% | 0.39% |
DMNBX DFA MN Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.96% | 2.50% | 2.23% | 2.65% | -2.03% | -0.31% | 2.01% | 3.30% | 0.81% | -46.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATOIX and DMNBX is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | 0.06 |
The correlation between ATOIX and DMNBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATOIX vs. DMNBX — Risk / Return Rank
ATOIX
DMNBX
ATOIX vs. DMNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) and DFA MN Municipal Bond Portfolio (DMNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATOIX | DMNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +14.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 11.67 | 1.98 | +9.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 32.63 | 3.54 | +29.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 96.00 | 11.32 | +84.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATOIX vs. DMNBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATOIX drawdown since its inception was -1.46%, smaller than the maximum DMNBX drawdown of -47.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATOIX and DMNBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATOIX | DMNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -47.47% | +46.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.50% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.10% | -0.91% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.37% | -3.90% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -40.14% | +40.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -44.00% | +43.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.16% | -0.13% |
Volatility
ATOIX vs. DMNBX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) and DFA MN Municipal Bond Portfolio (DMNBX) have volatilities of 0.22% and 0.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATOIX | DMNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 0.21% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.59% | 0.58% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89% | 0.74% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 1.07% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.79% | 15.53% | -14.74% |
ATOIX vs. DMNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATOIX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than DMNBX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATOIX vs. DMNBX - Dividend Comparison
ATOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than DMNBX's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 2.94% | 3.27% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 1.07% | 0.06% | 0.88% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 2.20% | 0.61% | 0.52% |
DMNBX DFA MN Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.28% | 2.06% | 2.10% | 1.48% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.60% | 1.14% | 1.10% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATOIX and DMNBX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATOIX has higher volatility (0.22%) compared to DMNBX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATOIX dropped -1.46% vs DMNBX's -47.47%.
ATOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATOIX and DMNBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer