ATOIX vs. DFSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX).
ATOIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Dec 4, 2002. DFSMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Aug 19, 2002.
Performance
ATOIX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATOIX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 0.35% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 3.27% | 0.87% | -0.04% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 1.54% | 2.24% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.55% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATOIX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than DFSMX's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ATOIX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return.
ATOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATOIX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATOIX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ATOIX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank
ATOIX
DFSMX
ATOIX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATOIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.51 | 3.68 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 18.38 | 6.50 | +11.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 11.59 | 3.20 | +8.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 32.23 | 4.59 | +27.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 93.42 | 21.83 | +71.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATOIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51 | 3.68 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.69 | 2.11 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.24 | 1.60 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.45 | 1.78 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATOIX and DFSMX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ATOIX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison
ATOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than DFSMX's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 2.90% | 3.27% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 1.07% | 0.06% | 0.88% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 2.20% | 0.61% | 0.52% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.43% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
ATOIX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATOIX drawdown since its inception was -1.46%, smaller than the maximum DFSMX drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATOIX and DFSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATOIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -2.66% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.39% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.37% | -1.67% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.43% | -1.69% | +1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.06% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.24% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.10% | -0.07% |
Volatility
ATOIX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) is 0.10%, while DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) has a volatility of 0.11%. This indicates that ATOIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATOIX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 0.11% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.65% | 0.37% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92% | 0.68% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.81% | 0.78% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.78% | 0.77% | +0.01% |