PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATNM vs. BBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATNM vs. BBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM) and BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics, Inc (BBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATNM achieves a -38.46% return, which is significantly lower than BBOT's -35.38% return.


ATNM

1D
-0.01%
1M
-14.69%
6M
-27.85%
YTD
-38.46%
1Y
-48.02%
3Y*
-51.06%
5Y*
-33.96%
10Y*
-33.78%
ALL TIME*
-25.11%

BBOT

1D
-4.82%
1M
-0.25%
6M
-30.97%
YTD
-35.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$68.73K$77.43K$122.09K
$2.40M$3.07M$3.39M

ATNM vs. BBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ATNM
Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-38.46%-7.48%
BBOT
BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics, Inc
-35.38%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ATNM and BBOT is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATNM:

$26.26M

BBOT:

$648.07M

EPS

ATNM:

-$0.75

BBOT:

-$3.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATNM:

$90.00K

BBOT:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATNM:

$485.00K

BBOT:

-$194.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

ATNM:

-$24.68M

BBOT:

-$168.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATNM vs. BBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATNM
ATNM Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ATNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATNM Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ATNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATNM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BBOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATNM vs. BBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM) and BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics, Inc (BBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATNMBBOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.61

ATNM vs. BBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATNM vs. BBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATNM drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, which is greater than BBOT's maximum drawdown of -48.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATNM and BBOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATNMBBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.79%

-48.14%

-51.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

-41.08%

-58.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.53%

-22.63%

-62.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.33%

Volatility

ATNM vs. BBOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATNMBBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.04%

69.10%

-7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.98%

69.10%

+10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.51%

69.10%

+12.41%

Dividends

ATNM vs. BBOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATNM nor BBOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ATNM vs. BBOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BridgeBio Oncology Therapeutics, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ATNM and BBOT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATNM and BBOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer