ATNF vs. SBET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about 180 Life Sciences Corp. (ATNF) and SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET).

Performance

ATNF vs. SBET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 180 Life Sciences Corp. (ATNF) and SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATNF vs. SBET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ATNF 180 Life Sciences Corp.	-41.02%	-73.08%	-54.36%
SBET SharpLink Gaming Ltd.	-27.85%	15.65%	-52.63%

Fundamentals

EPS ATNF : -$18.55K SBET : -$11.52
PS Ratio ATNF : 0.01 SBET : 14.67
Total Revenue (TTM) ATNF : $2.44B SBET : $28.06M
Gross Profit (TTM) ATNF : $0.00 SBET : $26.15M
EBITDA (TTM) ATNF : -$9.82B SBET : -$560.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATNF achieves a -41.02% return, which is significantly lower than SBET's -27.85% return.

ATNF

• 1D: 4.71%
• 1M: -18.13%
• YTD: -41.02%
• 6M: -88.01%
• 1Y: -70.51%
• 3Y*: -79.63%
• 5Y*: -83.74%
• 10Y*: —

SBET

• 1D: 7.32%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -27.85%
• 6M: -62.08%
• 1Y: 84.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATNF vs. SBET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATNF

ATNF Risk / Return Rank: 36
ATNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ATNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ATNF Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ATNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ATNF Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SBET

SBET Risk / Return Rank: 73
SBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SBET Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
SBET Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATNF vs. SBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 180 Life Sciences Corp. (ATNF) and SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATNF	SBET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.17	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	4.87	-3.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.65	-0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	1.07	-1.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	1.31	-2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATNF vs. SBET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATNF Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the SBET Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATNF and SBET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATNF	SBET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	0.17	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	-0.10	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between ATNF and SBET is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ATNF vs. SBET - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATNF nor SBET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ATNF vs. SBET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATNF drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SBET's maximum drawdown of -92.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATNF and SBET.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATNF	SBET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-92.41%	-7.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.50%	-92.41%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-91.86%	-8.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.89%	-63.58%	+9.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	70.71%	75.80%	-5.09%

Volatility

ATNF vs. SBET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 180 Life Sciences Corp. (ATNF) is 22.06%, while SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) has a volatility of 24.91%. This indicates that ATNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATNF	SBET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.06%	24.91%	-2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.87%	60.09%	+12.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	270.77%	499.33%	-228.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	227.95%	354.83%	-126.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	176.11%	354.83%	-178.72%

Financials