ATGSX vs. BDJ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ATGSX (Anchor Risk Managed Global Strategies Fund) and BDJ (BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust) are both mutual funds - ATGSX is a Long-Short fund managed by BlackRock, while BDJ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BlackRock. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ATGSX charges 2.25%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BDJ.

Performance

ATGSX vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anchor Risk Managed Global Strategies Fund (ATGSX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust (BDJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ATGSX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BDJ

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 1Y: 23.61%
• 3Y*: 16.03%
• 5Y*: 9.08%
• 10Y*: 10.53%
• ALL TIME*: 6.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust	$4.26M	$4.34M	$4.85M

ATGSX vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATGSX Anchor Risk Managed Global Strategies Fund	0.00%	5.43%	-0.40%	4.64%	-2.43%	2.09%	6.99%	14.51%
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust	8.31%	26.12%	16.87%	-6.67%	0.83%	26.56%	-7.58%	28.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ATGSX and BDJ is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2019	0.27

The correlation between ATGSX and BDJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ATGSX vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATGSX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDJ

BDJ Risk / Return Rank: 66
BDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATGSX vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anchor Risk Managed Global Strategies Fund (ATGSX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATGSX	BDJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.95	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.08	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ATGSX	BDJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.39%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.89%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATGSX	BDJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.17%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.03%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.40%	—

ATGSX vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATGSX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BDJ's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATGSX vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison

ATGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BDJ's 8.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATGSX Anchor Risk Managed Global Strategies Fund	0.95%	1.17%	0.87%	1.35%	0.00%	12.72%	1.21%	7.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust	8.73%	9.03%	8.21%	9.49%	12.18%	5.95%	7.08%	6.66%	7.21%	6.07%	6.88%	7.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATGSX and BDJ in my portfolio?

ATGSX and BDJ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.