PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATGAX vs. WHGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ATGAX

1D
0.85%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WHGMX

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.77%
YTD
12.30%
6M
14.36%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ATGAX and WHGMX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATGAX vs. WHGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATGAX

WHGMX
WHGMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
WHGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATGAXWHGMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

30.24

0.45

+29.79

Drawdowns

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATGAX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum WHGMX drawdown of -47.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATGAX and WHGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATGAXWHGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-47.99%

+47.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.70%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-7.20%

+7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

Volatility

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATGAXWHGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

15.46%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.31%

18.83%

-9.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

20.30%

-10.99%

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATGAX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WHGMX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATGAX vs. WHGMX - Dividend Comparison

ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WHGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WHGMX
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund
4.63%5.19%1.21%2.92%1.52%16.39%2.83%11.93%19.09%12.12%1.40%7.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATGAX and WHGMX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATGAX and WHGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer