PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATGAX vs. HDPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and Hodges Fund (HDPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ATGAX

1D
0.85%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDPMX

1D
1.99%
1M
13.22%
YTD
27.04%
6M
29.23%
1Y
53.57%
3Y*
35.58%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.87%
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ATGAX and HDPMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATGAX vs. HDPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATGAX

HDPMX
HDPMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HDPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and Hodges Fund (HDPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATGAXHDPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

30.24

0.40

+29.84

Drawdowns

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATGAX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum HDPMX drawdown of -69.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATGAX and HDPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATGAXHDPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-69.66%

+69.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-15.75%

+15.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

Volatility

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATGAXHDPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

22.49%

-13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.31%

29.58%

-20.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

30.38%

-21.07%

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATGAX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HDPMX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATGAX vs. HDPMX - Dividend Comparison

ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDPMX
Hodges Fund
7.47%9.50%15.93%0.72%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.67%7.26%0.00%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ATGAX and HDPMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATGAX and HDPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer