PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATGAX vs. FZFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ATGAX

1D
0.85%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FZFLX

1D
1.53%
1M
6.05%
YTD
33.04%
6M
33.74%
1Y
48.52%
3Y*
24.40%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ATGAX and FZFLX is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATGAX vs. FZFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATGAX

FZFLX
FZFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FZFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FZFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATGAXFZFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

30.24

0.63

+29.61

Drawdowns

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATGAX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FZFLX drawdown of -42.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATGAX and FZFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATGAXFZFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-42.03%

+42.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.74%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

Volatility

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATGAXFZFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

20.84%

-11.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.31%

21.11%

-11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

21.11%

-11.80%

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATGAX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FZFLX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATGAX vs. FZFLX - Dividend Comparison

ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FZFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
43.42%57.77%10.20%2.35%79.79%50.77%7.19%6.49%7.69%1.68%0.93%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATGAX and FZFLX have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATGAX and FZFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer