PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATGAX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ATGAX

1D
0.85%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DNLDX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.01%
YTD
11.26%
6M
12.16%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ATGAX and DNLDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATGAX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATGAX

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATGAXDNLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

30.24

0.55

+29.69

Drawdowns

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATGAX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATGAX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATGAXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-63.69%

+63.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.64%

+9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

Volatility

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATGAXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

13.12%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.31%

18.48%

-9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

19.51%

-10.20%

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATGAX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATGAX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.50%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ATGAX and DNLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATGAX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer