ATESX vs. BIVIX
ATESX (Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund) and BIVIX (Invenomic Fund Institutional Class) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, ATESX returned 3.81%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for BIVIX. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. ATESX charges 2.10%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for BIVIX.
Performance
ATESX vs. BIVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATESX achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than BIVIX's -1.98% return.
ATESX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- 6M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- —
BIVIX
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ATESX vs. BIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATESX Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund | 4.62% | 5.56% | 7.21% | 8.12% | -9.25% | 11.06% | 18.02% | 20.31% | 3.72% | 5.87% |
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | -1.98% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATESX and BIVIX is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | -0.18 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ATESX and BIVIX has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.18 to -0.40, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATESX vs. BIVIX — Risk / Return Rank
ATESX
BIVIX
ATESX vs. BIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX) and Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATESX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.05 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.17 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 0.47 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATESX vs. BIVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATESX drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum BIVIX drawdown of -26.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATESX and BIVIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATESX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -26.95% | +14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -26.95% | +18.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | -26.95% | +16.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.87% | -26.95% | +14.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.99% | -8.15% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -6.03% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 9.88% | -4.93% |
Volatility
ATESX vs. BIVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX) is 4.80%, while Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a volatility of 17.60%. This indicates that ATESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATESX | BIVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 17.60% | -12.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 26.70% | -17.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 30.39% | -18.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 18.50% | -7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 18.13% | -7.02% |
ATESX vs. BIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATESX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BIVIX's 3.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATESX vs. BIVIX - Dividend Comparison
ATESX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATESX Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.30% | 7.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.78% | 7.70% | 6.02% |
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.24% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATESX and BIVIX have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVIX has higher volatility (17.60%) compared to ATESX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATESX dropped -12.87% vs BIVIX's -26.95%.
ATESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATESX and BIVIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer