PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATE.PA vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Alten SA (ATE.PA) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATE.PA is traded in EUR, while GOOGL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOOGL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATE.PA achieves a -8.63% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 20.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ATE.PA has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 2.46%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 25.92% annualized return.


ATE.PA

1D
4.66%
1M
7.03%
YTD
-8.63%
6M
-4.82%
1Y
-7.80%
3Y*
-22.38%
5Y*
-7.39%
10Y*
2.46%

GOOGL

1D
-0.19%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
20.14%
6M
16.07%
1Y
118.39%
3Y*
39.41%
5Y*
26.80%
10Y*
25.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATE.PA
Alten SA
-8.63%-6.44%-40.45%16.47%-25.41%72.78%-17.64%56.31%5.62%5.77%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
20.14%46.30%44.98%53.58%-35.31%77.66%20.07%31.07%3.86%16.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ATE.PA and GOOGL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATE.PA
ATE.PA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ATE.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATE.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATE.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ATE.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATE.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alten SA (ATE.PA) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATE.PAGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.66

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

6.55

-6.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

22.40

-22.79

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATE.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATE.PA and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATE.PAGOOGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

4.09

-4.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.87

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.89

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.69

-0.48

Drawdowns

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATE.PA drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -60.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATE.PA and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATE.PAGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.02%

-60.91%

-33.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.61%

-18.17%

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.46%

-35.42%

-29.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.45%

-38.62%

-27.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.45%

-38.62%

-27.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.96%

-6.92%

-50.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.23%

-12.56%

-28.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.78%

5.31%

+13.47%

Volatility

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Alten SA (ATE.PA) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) have volatilities of 8.14% and 8.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATE.PAGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

8.36%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.68%

20.04%

+10.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.91%

29.15%

+7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.76%

31.04%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.91%

29.34%

+2.57%

Dividends

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

ATE.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than GOOGL's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATE.PA
Alten SA
2.27%2.07%1.90%1.11%1.11%0.63%0.00%0.89%1.38%1.44%1.50%1.87%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.23%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ATE.PA vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alten SA and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ATE.PA values in EUR, GOOGL values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ATE.PA and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATE.PA and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer