PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATCL vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATCL vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ATCL

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.14%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATCL vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ATCL and ARMW is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATCL vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Autocallable Income ETF (ATCL) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATCL vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATCLARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

4.96

-3.52

Drawdowns

ATCL vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATCL drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATCL and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATCLARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-48.47%

+42.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-26.55%

+25.67%

Volatility

ATCL vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATCLARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

88.46%

-79.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.06%

88.46%

-79.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.06%

88.46%

-79.40%

ATCL vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATCL vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

ATCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
15.20%16.38%
ATCL
REX Autocallable Income ETF
3.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATCL and ARMW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ATCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ATCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 3.38% for ATCL.

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ATCL and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATCL and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer