PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATACX vs. QSTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATACX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than QSTFX's 24.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ATACX has underperformed QSTFX with an annualized return of 7.26%, while QSTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.29% annualized return.


ATACX

1D
0.14%
1M
2.50%
6M
9.61%
YTD
11.73%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
7.26%

QSTFX

1D
3.35%
1M
4.22%
6M
19.98%
YTD
24.91%
1Y
40.59%
3Y*
21.20%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
19.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATACX
ATAC Rotation Fund
11.73%18.74%5.05%2.10%-25.80%-10.55%72.81%7.72%-11.44%27.03%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
24.91%-2.48%29.94%61.87%-46.15%28.79%78.20%16.43%-6.86%68.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ATACX and QSTFX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2015

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATACX vs. QSTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATACX
ATACX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ATACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ATACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QSTFX
QSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
QSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) and Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATACXQSTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.30

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

2.22

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.03

5.64

-2.61

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the QSTFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATACX and QSTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATACX drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QSTFX drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATACX and QSTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATACXQSTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-49.03%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-17.87%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-32.22%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.28%

-49.03%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-49.03%

-2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.20%

-2.03%

-13.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

-15.36%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

7.01%

-3.41%

Volatility

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) is 5.69%, while Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that ATACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATACXQSTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

11.44%

-5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

20.15%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.26%

26.53%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

27.39%

-6.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

28.06%

-7.41%

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATACX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QSTFX's 1.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATACX vs. QSTFX - Dividend Comparison

ATACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than QSTFX's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATACX
ATAC Rotation Fund
1.65%1.85%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.13%0.90%1.10%8.15%0.00%
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
8.53%10.65%5.12%1.03%0.00%21.93%20.82%0.52%2.57%39.11%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATACX and QSTFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSTFX has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to ATACX (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATACX dropped -51.26% vs QSTFX's -49.03%.

QSTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATACX and QSTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer