ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE
ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ASWC.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ASWC.DE returned 16.90% vs 1.03% for EUNA.DE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASWC.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASWC.DE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.61% return.
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 16.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.34%
- 5Y*
- -1.37%
- 10Y*
- —
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.04% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.37% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.61% | 2.91% | 1.48% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASWC.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASWC.DE
EUNA.DE
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASWC.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 0.29 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 0.81 | +2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, smaller than the maximum EUNA.DE drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASWC.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASWC.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -17.81% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.58% | -2.80% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -8.72% | +5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -6.70% | +4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 1.01% | +4.50% |
Volatility
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.34%. This indicates that ASWC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASWC.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 1.34% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.89% | 2.93% | +12.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.35% | 3.72% | +16.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 4.84% | +14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 4.45% | +14.66% |
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASWC.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASWC.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASWC.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASWC.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
ASWC.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. ASWC.DE tracks EQM Future of Defence Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ASWC.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for ASWC.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer