ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE
ASRY.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and ZA30.DE (iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ASRY.DE is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI World Select Filtered Min TE Index, while ZA30.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ASRY.DE returned 25.30% vs 29.48% for ZA30.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASRY.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for ZA30.DE.
Performance
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASRY.DE achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than ZA30.DE's 12.40% return.
ASRY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZA30.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 12.40%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRY.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 11.55% | 7.32% | 25.18% | 8.29% |
ZA30.DE iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 12.40% | 5.34% | 31.19% | 6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASRY.DE and ZA30.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between ASRY.DE and ZA30.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASRY.DE
ZA30.DE
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRY.DE) and iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASRY.DE | ZA30.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.46 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 4.28 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.04 | 16.33 | -1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASRY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, smaller than the maximum ZA30.DE drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRY.DE and ZA30.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASRY.DE | ZA30.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.60% | -23.45% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.75% | -6.91% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.11% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -3.18% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.81% | -0.12% |
Volatility
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World Min TE UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRY.DE) is 2.95%, while iShares S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (ZA30.DE) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that ASRY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZA30.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASRY.DE | ZA30.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 3.30% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 8.02% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 11.93% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 14.40% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.54% | 14.40% | -0.86% |
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASRY.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than ZA30.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ASRY.DE vs. ZA30.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASRY.DE nor ZA30.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ASRY.DE and ZA30.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZA30.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZA30.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for ASRY.DE.
ASRY.DE is categorized as ESG, while ZA30.DE is S&P 500. ASRY.DE tracks MSCI World Select Filtered Min TE Index, while ZA30.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for ASRY.DE and 0.07% for ZA30.DE.
Find the right allocation for ASRY.DE and ZA30.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer