PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF Dist (ASRT.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRT.DE achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than QDVL.DE's 0.74% return.


ASRT.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.52%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
10Y*

QDVL.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.78%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
0.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ASRT.DE
BNP Paribas Easy EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF Dist
0.59%2.88%4.14%7.70%-9.31%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.74%2.81%4.24%4.30%-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRT.DE and QDVL.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022

0.67

The correlation between ASRT.DE and QDVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRT.DE
ASRT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ASRT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVL.DE
QDVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF Dist (ASRT.DE) and iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASRT.DEQDVL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.33

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

2.08

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

8.99

-6.92

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the QDVL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRT.DE and QDVL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASRT.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.65

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.32

-0.07

Drawdowns

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRT.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, which is greater than QDVL.DE's maximum drawdown of -8.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRT.DE and QDVL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRT.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-8.22%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-0.93%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.87%

-0.93%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.01%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-0.71%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.22%

+0.65%

Volatility

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF Dist (ASRT.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVL.DE) at 0.34%. This indicates that ASRT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRT.DEQDVL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.34%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

1.02%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33%

1.18%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.07%

1.58%

+3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

2.86%

+2.21%

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRT.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ASRT.DE vs. QDVL.DE - Dividend Comparison

ASRT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than QDVL.DE's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ASRT.DE
BNP Paribas Easy EUR Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF Dist
2.49%3.29%3.49%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVL.DE
iShares EUR Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.91%3.04%2.95%1.95%0.31%0.13%0.23%0.27%0.13%0.12%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRT.DE and QDVL.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVL.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVL.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ASRT.DE.

ASRT.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate SRI Sustainable Select Ex Fossil Fuel PAB, while QDVL.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate 0-3 Sustainable SRI. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas Asset Management Luxembourg and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ASRT.DE and 0.12% for QDVL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRT.DE and QDVL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer