PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRR.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRR.DE achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 15.46% return.


ASRR.DE

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.08%
6M
7.40%
YTD
11.11%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
10Y*

CEMS.DE

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.51%
6M
12.44%
YTD
15.46%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
11.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ASRR.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
11.11%11.63%7.07%13.88%-10.86%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
15.46%36.00%9.92%13.88%-6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.82

The correlation between ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRR.DE
ASRR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ASRR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRR.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASRR.DECEMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.28

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

12.34

-7.80

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRR.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.26%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRR.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.26%

-40.22%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-10.02%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-17.61%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.72%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-7.44%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.67%

+0.77%

Volatility

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ASRR.DE) is 3.12%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that ASRR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRR.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

4.20%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

12.03%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

14.24%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

15.28%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.77%

17.06%

-2.29%

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ASRR.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRR.DE nor CEMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

ASRR.DE tracks MSCI Europe SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRR.DE and CEMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer