PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRD.DE achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than JMBA.DE's 4.33% return.


ASRD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.70%
6M
0.65%
YTD
0.46%
1Y
7.39%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*

JMBA.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.55%
6M
3.60%
YTD
4.33%
1Y
10.91%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
0.46%11.16%3.52%6.69%-19.97%-1.25%
JMBA.DE
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
4.33%0.84%7.77%5.79%-10.80%5.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRD.DE and JMBA.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

0.45

The correlation between ASRD.DE and JMBA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRD.DE
ASRD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBA.DE
JMBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASRD.DEJMBA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.84

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

11.71

-6.14

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRD.DE and JMBA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRD.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, which is greater than JMBA.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRD.DE and JMBA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRD.DEJMBA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-26.66%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-3.14%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-12.45%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-14.09%

-15.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-1.40%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-11.27%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.03%

+0.30%

Volatility

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) is 0.96%, while JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) has a volatility of 1.53%. This indicates that ASRD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRD.DEJMBA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.53%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.00%

4.11%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.92%

6.05%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.05%

8.43%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.83%

10.70%

-1.87%

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBA.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASRD.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRD.DE nor JMBA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRD.DE and JMBA.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBA.DE.

ASRD.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged), while JMBA.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ASRD.DE and 0.39% for JMBA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRD.DE and JMBA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer