PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRD.DE achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than EMEH.DE's 21.33% return.


ASRD.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
0.84%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.27%
1Y
8.54%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*

EMEH.DE

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
21.33%
6M
24.96%
1Y
44.23%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
0.59%11.16%3.52%6.69%-19.97%0.96%
EMEH.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
21.33%25.40%6.63%-12.26%11.15%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRD.DE and EMEH.DE is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.09

The correlation between ASRD.DE and EMEH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRD.DE
ASRD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEH.DE
EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASRD.DEEMEH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.95

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

14.34

-7.77

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRD.DE and EMEH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASRD.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.47

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.64

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.48

+0.47

Drawdowns

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRD.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum EMEH.DE drawdown of -92.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRD.DE and EMEH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRD.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-92.42%

+62.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-8.89%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-12.28%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-32.73%

+3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.16%

-80.34%

+76.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-81.38%

+68.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

3.08%

-1.78%

Volatility

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) is 1.86%, while BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that ASRD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRD.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

4.15%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.97%

15.95%

-10.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.97%

17.83%

-11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.06%

17.50%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.96%

34.16%

-25.20%

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEH.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASRD.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRD.DE nor EMEH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRD.DE and EMEH.DE have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

ASRD.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EMEH.DE is Commodities. ASRD.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged), while EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ASRD.DE and 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRD.DE and EMEH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer