PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ASRC.DE is traded in USD, while ZPR5.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPR5.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRC.DE achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than ZPR5.DE's 0.97% return.


ASRC.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
1.01%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.44%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
1.70%
10Y*

ZPR5.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASRC.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF
1.68%13.42%5.17%9.72%-17.46%1.29%
ZPR5.DE
SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.97%8.24%4.69%5.76%-6.51%-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRC.DE and ZPR5.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.37

The correlation between ASRC.DE and ZPR5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRC.DE
ASRC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ASRC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPR5.DE
ZPR5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASRC.DEZPR5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.91

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

12.18

-2.67

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRC.DE and ZPR5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASRC.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.31

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.38

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.40

-0.16

Drawdowns

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRC.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.88%, which is greater than ZPR5.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRC.DE and ZPR5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRC.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.88%

-12.02%

-15.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-1.83%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-2.79%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.88%

-12.02%

-15.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.18%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-2.07%

-7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

0.44%

+0.70%

Volatility

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE) at 0.93%. This indicates that ASRC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPR5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRC.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

0.93%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

2.87%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.39%

4.06%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

5.80%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.25%

5.87%

+2.38%

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRC.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPR5.DE's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASRC.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Dividend Comparison

ASRC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZPR5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASRC.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPR5.DE
SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF
4.83%5.10%4.16%3.16%2.54%2.63%3.53%3.34%2.73%3.18%2.72%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRC.DE and ZPR5.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRC.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRC.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ZPR5.DE.

ASRC.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while ZPR5.DE tracks ICE BofA Emerging Markets USD Government Bond 0-5 ex-144a. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ASRC.DE and 0.42% for ZPR5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRC.DE and ZPR5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer