PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASRC.DE achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than ESAP.DE's 10.03% return.


ASRC.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
1.01%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.44%
1Y
10.84%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
1.70%
10Y*

ESAP.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
4.49%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.96%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASRC.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF
1.68%13.42%5.17%9.72%-17.46%1.29%
ESAP.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD
10.03%17.48%24.85%26.98%-19.18%25.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ASRC.DE and ESAP.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.46

The correlation between ASRC.DE and ESAP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (5 years) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASRC.DE
ASRC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ASRC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ESAP.DE
ESAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASRC.DEESAP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.35

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

14.32

-4.80

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASRC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the ESAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASRC.DE and ESAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASRC.DEESAP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.34

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.84

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.88

-0.64

Drawdowns

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASRC.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.88%, smaller than the maximum ESAP.DE drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRC.DE and ESAP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASRC.DEESAP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.88%

-34.23%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-8.20%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-18.69%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.88%

-24.33%

-3.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.56%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-5.37%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.93%

-0.79%

Volatility

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) is 1.92%, while BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (ESAP.DE) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that ASRC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASRC.DEESAP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

3.09%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

8.58%

-4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.39%

11.76%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

16.01%

-7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.25%

17.99%

-9.74%

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRC.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAP.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ASRC.DE vs. ESAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRC.DE nor ESAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ASRC.DE and ESAP.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ASRC.DE.

ASRC.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while ESAP.DE is S&P 500. ASRC.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while ESAP.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ASRC.DE and 0.15% for ESAP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASRC.DE and ESAP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer