ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE
ASRC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF) and CEB0.DE (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - ASRC.DE tracks the JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified while CEB0.DE tracks the Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ASRC.DE returned 10.84% vs 3.33% for CEB0.DE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASRC.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CEB0.DE.
Performance
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ASRC.DE is traded in USD, while CEB0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CEB0.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASRC.DE achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than CEB0.DE's 0.46% return.
ASRC.DE
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- —
CEB0.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ASRC.DE BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF | 1.68% | 13.42% | 4.19% |
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 0.46% | 13.38% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASRC.DE and CEB0.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ASRC.DE
CEB0.DE
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASRC.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.10 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 0.68 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.51 | 1.68 | +7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASRC.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 0.52 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.00 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASRC.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.88%, which is greater than CEB0.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRC.DE and CEB0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASRC.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.88% | -6.45% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.48% | -4.87% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -2.28% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -1.88% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.98% | -0.84% |
Volatility
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF (ASRC.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) at 1.44%. This indicates that ASRC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEB0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASRC.DE | CEB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 1.44% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.52% | 4.54% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.39% | 6.39% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.33% | 7.39% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.25% | 7.39% | +0.86% |
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASRC.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CEB0.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASRC.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Dividend Comparison
ASRC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEB0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ASRC.DE BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEB0.DE iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist | 1.81% | 1.84% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASRC.DE and CEB0.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASRC.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASRC.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CEB0.DE.
ASRC.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while CEB0.DE tracks Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ASRC.DE and 0.40% for CEB0.DE.
Find the right allocation for ASRC.DE and CEB0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer