ASRAX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund (ASRAX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
ASRAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on May 30, 2002. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
ASRAX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASRAX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRAX Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund | 1.87% | 7.08% | -2.68% | 11.90% | -20.93% | 19.97% | -5.10% | 15.50% | -4.33% | 8.78% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 0.33% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASRAX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ASRAX has underperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.
ASRAX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASRAX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASRAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASRAX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
ASRAX
FRINX
ASRAX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund (ASRAX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASRAX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.91 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.23 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.09 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 4.54 | -0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASRAX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.91 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.54 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.53 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.75 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASRAX and FRINX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ASRAX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
ASRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FRINX's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASRAX Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund | 2.57% | 2.71% | 3.58% | 2.96% | 2.38% | 1.89% | 2.32% | 5.57% | 3.51% | 3.45% | 4.49% | 5.79% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.38% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
ASRAX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASRAX drawdown since its inception was -64.52%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASRAX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASRAX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.52% | -34.50% | -30.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -4.28% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.35% | -18.30% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.04% | -34.50% | -0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -2.72% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -3.41% | -8.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 1.03% | +1.41% |
Volatility
ASRAX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund (ASRAX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.65%. This indicates that ASRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASRAX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 1.65% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 2.87% | +4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 4.92% | +7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 6.51% | +6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 9.50% | +3.79% |