ASMU vs. QQQE
ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ASMU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while QQQE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. ASMU is actively managed, while QQQE is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for QQQE.
Performance
ASMU vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASMU
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 50.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 10.46%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
ASMU vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 30.81% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 18.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMU and QQQE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMU vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank
ASMU
QQQE
ASMU vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMU | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | 0.76 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
ASMU vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and QQQE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMU | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -32.14% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -5.17% | -8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility
ASMU vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMU | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.13% | 14.15% | +80.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 20.30% | +74.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 20.72% | +74.41% |
ASMU vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMU vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison
ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than QQQE's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.52% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMU and QQQE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.
QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.16% for ASMU.
ASMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.35% for QQQE.
Find the right allocation for ASMU and QQQE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer